This is a religious training centre with the believe below.EXPOSING THE LIES AND DISTORTIONS OF ROSHEED MUSTOPHA AL-KHOORIJEE, THE TREES AND BIRDS PROFESSOR (3)Posted on March 14, 2017 by Aboo Aaishah Al OdeomeeyAll perfect praise is for Allaah alone. We beseech His peace and blessings upon Muhammad (sollaLloohu ‘alayhi wa sallam).In continuation, Shaykh Muhammad Noosirudeen Al-Albaanee (rohimohuLlaah) said, while discussing issues regarding making takfeer and tabdee’ of the Muslims, “I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE REALITY THAT WHOEVER DECLARES A MUSLIM TO BE A DISBELIEVER, HAS HIMSELF DISBELIEVED. AND I ADDED TO IT THAT WHOEVER DECLARES A MUSLIM TO BE AN INNOVATOR (IS ALSO HIMELF AN INNOVATOR), BECAUSE IN REALITY, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KUFR AND BID’AH.”Muhammad ‘Aliyy Jabata al-Khoorijee (Mr ‘tatment’ and ‘grammer’), Rosheed Mustopha al-Khoorijee (the trees and birds professor) and some other Jabatawiyyoon are used to quoting the statement, ‘THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KUFR AND BID’AH’ out of context and romancing it when trying to establish their falsehood. This statement is very clear and easy to understand within the context of this conversation. Shaykh Al-Albaanee (rohimohuLlaah) meant by this that if one declares a Muslim as a kaafir (while the accused is free from the declaration), then he himself (the one who made the wrong declaration) becomes a kaafir, with respect to the narration regarding this; this is also applicable to declaring a person as an innovator. It was under this explanation that he (rohimohuLlaah) said, “BECAUSE IN REALITY, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KUFR AND BID’AH”. With this statement, Shaykh meant that there is no difference between the fact that if you declare a Muslim as a kaafir (the ruling falls back on), and if you declare a Muslim as mubtadi’h (the ruling falls back on you). Therefore none of the two should be ruled out when misapplied. This explanation is needed to clarify the misguidance of those who hold that the ruling is only applicable for takfeer and not for tabdee’. This is what the Shaykh clarified. What is the fuss with the statement? We ask Allaah to save us from being parochial in intellect.Even more important, it is illogical to jump into a conversation and expunge a statement in order to establish a ruling. That’s unjust. We understand the statements of the scholars by reading them between the lines, under the tutelage of the people of knowledge. This simple and comprehensive explanation is what we find in the book of Shaykh ‘Amroo ‘Abdulmun’im Saleem (al-monhaju ssalaf ‘inda ash-shaykh Noosiruddeen al-Albaanee). He mentioned this conversation and gave similar explanations. We ask you to mention the scholars under whose tutelage you learnt that Shaykh Albaanee was affirming that there is no difference of any kind between bid’ah and a major kufr.

Just try and visit these place

Cool and serene

Average content provider

Incomplete